What British Catholics Believe, vs Vatican Doctrine.

Once again, two opinion polls (for ITV, and for the BBC) have demonstrated what we all know, but pay insufficient attention to: the enormous chasm that divides Catholic belief as is is, and what Vatican doctrine proclaims it ought to be.


On the ministry itself, whether it is priestly celibacy or women’s ministry, and especially on all matters of sexual ethics, what British Catholics in fact believe is very different from what the Vatican functionaries proclaim it ought to be. This is no surprise – exactly the same pattern is found the world over – only the detailed numbers change, not the basic fact of divergence.

On one side, we have Vatican doctrine that insists the female ordination is beyond even discussion and the mere attempt to assist in such ordinations is tantamount to self-excommunication – on the other, the majority of catholics who believe that women need either ordination, or at least a greater role and more authority in the Church.

The Vatican insists that the priesthood must retain the rule on compulsory celibacy for priests (at least, those who are not in the Eastern rite churches, or were not previously married and ordained in other denominations) – on the other, ordinary British Catholics do not buy into this inconsistency and two-thirds believe priests should be allowed to marry.

Humanae Vitae prohibits all forms of artificial contraception. Only 4% of British Catholics agree – while 71% believed that condoms should be used more often.

Abortion is always wrong, in all circumstance, says the institutional Church – and declared that a religious sister and professional ethicist who consented to an abortion to save a mother’s life had excommunicated herself. 30 % of British Catholics believe that abortion should “always” be permitted, and a further 44% that it should be permitted in cases of rape, incest and a severe disability to the child. Only 6% accept the Vatican doctrine as it stands.

Homosexualitatis Problema” proclaims that the “homosexual condition” is gravely disordered, and that homosexual “acts” are a grave sin. Ordinary Catholics do not agree, with 44% saying that homosexual relationships should be celebrated (along with heterosexual ones).

Secularist and non-Catholic Christians are appalled at the attempts to control political decision by Church leaders who are not supported even by the people of their own Church.

Keith Porteous Wood, executive director of the National Secular Society, said: “Pope Benedict says he wants a smaller, purer church. With so many of his flock out of step with his social teachings, it looks like he’s going to get his wish.

“It is sobering to reflect that the immense political power exerted by the Church at the UN and in Brussels reflects the views of a few elderly men, not even of the Church they purport to represent.”

Daily Telegraph

Catholics should be equally angry, and outspoken, that Vatican doctrine is too easily and too frequently incorrectly presented as “Catholic belief”. It quite patently is nothing of the sort.

I fully accept that formulation of Catholic teaching cannot be done by simply counting votes in a referendum or opinion poll, and that Church leadership cannot be determined by some form of parliamentary type election. However, it is equally untenable to ignore the important concept of the sensus fidelium, which teaches that unless a doctrine has the support of the “whole church”, it is simply not valid. Quite how wedetermine the sense of the “whole church” is not clear – but it cannot be left simply to a bunch of celibate men in Vatican ivory towers, totally removed from what ordinary Catholics believe.

It is critical that a broader range of Catholics, religious women and  married and single laity, heterosexual and homosexual alike, should all have their voices heard and considered – and given some formal status in decision –making processes.

A start has been made in this direction with the recent theological council in Trent – this process must go much further, until we have a third Vatican Council that more truly reflects the church “as a whole”.


Related Articles at “Queering the Church”:

Related Articles Elsewhere

Enhanced by Zemanta
%d bloggers like this: