I wrote a couple of days ago how about how closely Richard Sipe’s comments (quoted at the Wild Reed) on sexuality and the church, on the sensus fidelium, and the hierarchy, so closely matched the conclusions I was reaching myself. What I didn’t know at the time, was that William Lindsey posted a comment at the Wild Reed immediately after my own with almost identical thoughts on the comments thread. Bill, like me, also wrote about this in his own blog, drawing attention to the “synchronicity” involved: Colleen Kochivar – Baker too had been writing along similar lines. Since then, Bill has written again about the synchronicities involved.
“Synchronicity” is a word I have been using a lot lately, especially in private correspondence with Bill Lindsey. There have been several occasions where one or other of us have been wanting to write on a particular topic, but have been slow to do so: then found the other has written something almost identical. As illustration, the story of the South African athlete is one example. As a South African travelling in that country as the news broke of rumoured gender test results, I was thinking of writing, but stalled as I wondered if it was strictly relevant to this blog . No sooner had I decided to put something together, than I found that Bill had written a post with almost identical thoughts to my own, so I left the topic alone, except for a comment at Bilgrimage. There have also been other examples.
“Synchronicity” is a word carefully chosen, in clear distinction to “co-incidence”. In strictly temporal terms, they mean much the same thing, but “co-incidence” implies an occurrence due purely to chance. “Synchronicity” has no such connotation, and suggests instead at least the possibility of some linking causality- such as (perhaps) the influence of the Holy Spirit. Read the rest of this entry »