Therese of Lisieux: An Ally in Our Gay Great War.

‘A man must leave his father and mother and join himself to his wife.’

Philip Endean SJ, Professor of theology at the University of Oxford,  noted in the opening words of his sermon to the Soho Mass last Sunday, that

“The relationship between today’s scripture and the lived experience of this congregation is … well, interesting.”

As it happens, one of the books I have been reading recently is Endean’s “Karl Rahner and Ignatian Spirituality”, based on his own doctoral thesis on the subject. The German Karl Rahner is notoriously difficult to read – his own brother once remarked that someone should “translate his writing into German. ”  I have appreciated the clarity of Endean’s exposition, making Rahner’s dense thought easily intelligible, so I was looking forward to his homily.  He did not disappoint.

By starting with the other theme in the Gospel,

‘Let the little children come to me’ ‘Anyone who does not welcome the Kingdom of God as a little child will not enter it at all’

and continuing by comparing this image to the spirituality of St Therese of Lisieux (whose relics are currently on tour around the UK), he proceeded to deliver a homily that I found thought-provoking, helpful and topical. As it also shed some light on the discussion in comments to my recent post on the rosary, I would like to share it with you now.

Saint Therese of Lisieux

Saint Therese of Lisieux

This image of the child, the non-person, receiving the Kingdom of God as a gift. It’s an image associated with St Thérèse of Lisieux, whose feast the Church celebrated this week, and whose relics are currently on a triumphant tour through the land. I happened to be talking this week with someone from the Portsmouth diocese where she had made her first stop. He did not strike me as one of nature’s devotees to the Little Flower, but he had clearly been impressed. ‘It shows you what the Church is really about: not discipline, not teaching, not organization, but people in need finding something very simple in their religion, something that gives them hope, something that helps them struggle on.’ Quite simply, they find love. He might have been echoing Thérèse’s own phrase: ‘love at the heart of the Church’.

Thérèse, for me as an academic interested in spirituality, is a quite fascinating figure. I don’t think we can just ignore the critical, even cynical, comments that have been made about her cult. But one cannot deny its power. Her autobiographical manuscripts—suitably or unsuitably sanitised by her bossy big sister—appeared in the first decade of the last century. If you go to her sanctuary at Lisieux, what is just obvious from the votive stones is how this story of a psychologically damaged child facing an early painful death, and undergoing powerful experiences of abandonment and loss of faith—this story somehow helped French soldiers who had to struggle with the horror of World War I; more generally, she seems to have touched into the experiences of poor Catholics in the workforce of an industrial society of Northern Europe that could often be brutal and insecure. Thérèse’s centenary in 1997 came a month after the death of Princess Diana; and maybe the Diana phenomenon helps us understand Thérèse. Both are vulnerable young women, making lots of mistakes, dying young and tragically—both tap into realities normally hidden within our collective psyche, and provoke it into expression. ……… But something important is happening when Thérèse and Diana are evoked. Realities often buried and overlooked, and which because they are unacknowledged are often doing us damage—these come to the surface, in however distorted a form. And we are better off because we have been allowed, however temporarily, however incompletely, to access them.

The problem for non-historians in trying to evaluate figures from the past is that we tend to evaluate them from a modern perspective, whereas it is more appropriate to see them in the context of their own times.  Fr Endean did this for us by pointing out that while Therese’s ideas today are part of the mainstream of Catholic thinking, in her own day, she was a revolutionary.

The problem with her writing is that its doctrinal ideas have been so successful and influential within twentieth-century Christianity that we no longer recognise that they were once new and surprising. In the middle of the century, our mainstream church understanding of grace changed, so that what Thérèse was on about no longer seems a big deal. My current research on Gerard Manley Hopkins has led me to think about what Catholic spiritual life was like in the nineteenth century.  The dangers of caricature are considerable; but you cannot avoid the impression that at very deep levels the religious enterprise was set up so that you could only fail at it; and the religious apparatus available to the average Catholic was largely concerned with the negotiation of guilt. In this world, Thérèse saw something new. You can leave all the concerns with rules aside. You can just let God be with you in your weakness and failure, and love you; you can just let that love supply for all your needs. She advocates the so-called Little Way. There are paths to heaven that involve steep climbs; but then there’s this new route which just gets you there in a flash—like these strange new machines called elevators that they have in New York and about which we’ve read newspaper articles even here in dozy Lisieux. The way of love: love at the heart of the Church; love available to all, no matter what the failures they are having to live with, no matter what the burdens they are carrying.

And this is the key to her significance to all of us in conflict with the  rules of the church.  We have a pressing need to challenge unjust teaching and practice, to find ways to deal with injustice in our minds and consciences, and to help others who share our difficulties to do the same. Although the mystical or spiritual path may easily be seen as a distraction, an opt-out from this struggle, we should more rightly see this path as a source of strength to help in the struggle – just as the French soldiers found a source of strength in her in the Great War .

Which brings me, at last, to Jesus’s teaching on marriage and divorce, and the incongruity of such heterosexist talk with the experience of a congregation such as this. And the move I am going to make is an obvious one. Jesus states some rules, but then something else happens: the children come, the bossy disciples want to shoo them away, but Jesus overrules them, takes the children, the non-persons, into his arms and blesses them. The rules of the Church are there, ultimately, because we care about the value of each human being. They are necessary; they have their place. But, for all their divine warrant, they are human creations as well, articulated in corrupt and fallible human language. They cannot fit everyone. You have to read them for what they are trying to do, not for what they actually do to people already hurt—for the good that they are seeking to promote, however imperfectly, rather than the problems they create. At the heart of the Church is not the strict rule, the exceptionless moral norm, but love: love that we only receive in our weakness, in our unpersonhood, as a gift.


Marian piety is no substitute for serious work on the structural sexisms of our Church and society; and a pilgrimage to Thérèse’s bones is far short of the Kingdom of God for which we long, for the ultimate transformation of the oppression that Thérèse shared with so many. There is a danger that religion becomes just a painkiller. There are powerful criticisms of Christianity and Catholicism to this effect, and they are not to be written off. But suspicion need not, must not be our only attitude. We can, we should, also be prepared to think positively. The Thérèses and the Dianas of our symbolic world can serve as an inspiration really to change things, or rather to let them be changed. The heart of the Church lies not in its rules or its theologies or its structures, but in openness to love and to being loved, the openness of the child: openness to a love that raises the lowly, taking them up the elevator in a trice. It’s that subversive power that is at the heart of the Church: the power of the leader who, Hebrews said, became through suffering like his sisters and brothers in every respect, dying a death of ritual impurity, under a curse—and who from that condition invites to come to him outside the camp in order that from there we might share his resurrection. (My emphasis)

Read  the full homily here.

2 Responses to “Therese of Lisieux: An Ally in Our Gay Great War.”

  1. contoveros Says:

    To You,
    I am a lapsed Catholic who finds meditation and the writings of eastern thinkers to be a comfort. I know that I touch the child in me whenever I meditate, I forgive myself for all the expectations that I have not met, will not meet in the future, and I hearken back to a time when I was twelve, kneeling in a sacristy in my altar boy uniform, praying that God grant me the love . . . of . . . Geraldine McFadden, a 12 yr old I had met at a party.
    My wish for her affection, however, faded away as I slipped into a state where I felt God’s love and complete acceptance of me. It didn’t matter whether I would win the girl. I had encountered and received a much greater love, the Divine Love that I know I can tap into by reaching inside to that pure, loving boy that once wanted to be a priest and today simply wants to serve humanity.
    I also want to do it with a smile on my face and by creating a laugh in your heart!
    Great reading. Where can I get more info on this saint? Where can I get readings about our Catholic mystical heritage?
    Michael J

    • queeringthechurch Says:

      I’m pleased, Contoveros, that you found this good reading, and that you have joined the discussion. For more on-line reading on mysticism, I can strongly recommend that you have a look at my colleague Jayden Cameron’s blog “Gay Mystic
      where he writes about mysticism in many forms, and from perspectives – sometimes Catholic, sometimes Eastern, sometimes specifically gay, often not.

      For printed books on the topic, have a look at the “spirituality and prayer” book list on my companion site, “Sergius & Bacchus Books”. This is where I am compiling information on a wide range of books of importance to faith, sexuality, or both together – here too from a range of perspectives.

      (This list, like the others on the site, is still fairly new. I am constantly expanding and updating the information as I find it, and as I find time to work on the updating process.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: